Sets and Scenery
The sets on the 2005 P&P are
lovely, it is true. However, one of my big problems with where the Bennets
lived was that they appeared to be occupying a functioning farm, complete with
a farm yard and animals! The book, to my memory, never indicates that they live
in any such place. The other notable place to compare is Pemberley. Personally,
I think that the one from this movie looks more medieval and could almost have
been part of a castle – it lacks only a turret! But the roof and square-ness of
it are, I believe, what makes me think that.
The Pemberley in the 1995 version
is a beautiful building. I think it looks a little newer than the other. The
pillars in the front are most eye-catching. The Bennets live in what is, by
Regency standards, a modest house. Thankfully, no animals wander through at
their own times. There is some beautiful scenery to be seen in this movie…and
really, in either version.
Soundtrack
Personally, I love the 1995 P&P
soundtrack, but some of that is no doubt due to the fact that I do love the
movie. This soundtrack is light and lively and bright and I like it. But as you
know if you know anything about the P&P movies, the soundtrack for the 2005
version is stunning. Everyone loves it, and with good reason. Make sure you
listen to it!
It may
seem strange that I’m comparing the hairstyles when I didn’t do costumes…but I
didn’t claim that this would be a comprehensive and complete comparison, so
don’t fault me please. In the 1995 version, Lizzy especially displays several
lovely hairstyles, that are obviously
very complicated and took time to put up. Her hair is practically always neat.
Lizzy in the 2005 P&P often has messy hair, by comparison – a bun that’s
falling down, or even loose hair (which, for night, is understandable). Even
for her important ball (that is, the Netherfield one where she dances with
Darcy) her hair is up in a pretty but messy style. She has an occasional neat
one, but in general, her hairstyles are what I might expect to see on a tomboy
of a girl like Jo March from Little
Women, but not on a young English woman.
Then of
course, we must briefly touch on the hair of the Darcies. Or would it be
Darcys? Your pick. Mr. Darcy (that is, THE Mr. Darcy aka Colin Firth from the
1995) has impeccable hair. Except for after swimming, when it’s…well, looks
like it went swimming. Despite rather a tumult of curls, it’s as neat as it can
be for that length. I suppose one could say almost the same thing about the
2005 Darcy’s hair…as neat as it can be for that length. But it shouldn’t be
that long! It is in a perpetual state (rather like Elizabeth’s) of messy!
Which, for a man as meticulous as Darcy, is bad…he wouldn’t have hair like
that. In my ever humble opinion.
Important Scenes
Pride and Prejudice (1995) |
Pride and Prejudice (2005) |
Darcy’s First Proposal: In the 1995 version, Mr. Darcy speaks in a sensible, down-putting way, biting out his words and obviously believing himself to be conferring a favor. The 2005 version portrays him as if perhaps he really does love her – he’s more loving in his words, and the way he says them. The 95 makes it more as if he is asking her because he cannot resist her wit and looks. Then too, there’s the setting. If I remember right, the 1995 one is quite exact to the book – Lizzy is spending some peaceful time at home reading letters, and is interrupted by Darcy (this happens at least one other time, so I may be confused). But in the 2005 one! Lizzy hurries out of church, runs through the rain, and then stands, only to discover to her dismay that Darcy has chased her. Panting (and dripping wet), he states his proposal. That scene…well, it didn’t help my love for the movie.
Darcy’s Second Proposal: Ah, the one
that worked! So, the 1995 version. Again, one awesome thing about this scene
(and this version) is that it sticks close to the book. I checked, just to make
sure. Specifically, the setting – outside in autumn on a walk with Bingley and
Jane. There, Mr. Darcy quite sweetly pours out his heart and they stroll on
happily.
But the 2005 version! Excuse me while I take a deep breath and try to calm down…
But the 2005 version! Excuse me while I take a deep breath and try to calm down…
It
didn’t work. Oh well! To be blunt, the 2005 version’s second proposal…is
frightful. Dreadful. Inaccurate. Lizzy decides to take a short walk in the
garden before changing to day clothes, and while there, suddenly spies Darcy
striding across the prairie/tundra/land through the mist, half-dressed himself
(to be exact, a white shirt in a deep V down his chest, pants, and a
house-robe, of all things). He reaches her, they exchange a short conversation,
and ta-da, he proposes again! Lizzy is deeply touched, and shows by taking his
hands, kissing them, and then murmuring “Your hands are cold.” How romantic is
that? Or not…IMHO, definitely not. The best part about this scene? The music. I
must admit that it IS absolutely stunningly beautiful. I can’t begin to list
the things that bug about this scene, so I won’t try any further than I already
had…suffice it to say that once again, I prefer the 1995 version.
Final scene: In the 1995
P&P, it ends with Darcy and Lizzy and Bingley and Jane all happily loaded
into carriages, with the last shot being Darcy and Lizzy sharing a kiss. The
2005 P&P, however, ends with a rather intimate lake-side scene – and never
shows the wedding (a disappointment to my wedding-loving sisters). I most
decidedly do not like that scene.
Overall
Well,
clearly, the 2005 version of Pride and
Prejudice did not come out on top as my favorite version. I love the 1995
one – I’ve seen it more than any other MOVIE in my life. Or TV series. Or what
have you. That comes to a lot of times. The 2005 version has a few pros, but
overall, my allegiance is (and likely always will be) to the 1995 version.
About me: I am a Christian homeschooled Austen addict in my
late teens. I’ve been blogging about the books I’ve read and the movies I’ve
seen for over two years now on my blog, Austenitis (http://austenitis.blogspot.com/). I
love the color blue, anything to do with books, period drama and fantasy
movies, photography, and giveaways. I’d love to see you over on my blog!
Hello, step often find you and I really like what I see!
ReplyDeleteI to Pemberly, or Chatsworth House, there really was .....
and is a magnificent residence!
I just did a post on Montacute House, where they
filmed Sense and Sensibility, come visit!
Love Susy x
The song in the 2005 dance scene is called a postcard to henry purcell because it is an adaptation from Purcell's "hornpipe" from the Abdelazer suite. To my knowledge it is never featured in the 1995 version. The song that is danced in the 1995 version is the dance mr beveridge's maggot and its accompanying music. I am a wellspring of USELESS information hahaha.
ReplyDeleteThe 1995 version is better for accuracy, but I find that if I just want to watch a nice romantic movie, the 2005 movie is better. I have also done some research on the 2005 movie, and the settings were done without regard to what we traditionally see in Regency dramas; basically, they purposely made things messier and more "real-life".
ReplyDeleteOh, and the wedding? Well, there really wasn't one in the book, if I recall, so in that way, the '95 was not accurate. We all love a wedding, but Austen tended to avoid or breeze over them.
Thanks for the review!
E. Waterman -- ah-ha! That always confused me. When I got the soundtrack, I could never figure out why that song was in there under that name. I was pretty sure it went with the movie, but I couldn't for the life of me think of any Henry Purcell. Thanks for the help! It certainly was not useless. :) Since there were several dances in 1995 version, I still think it was in there somewhere...not sure where, though. I'll have to watch it again. :)
ReplyDeleteEmily Ruth, thanks for commenting! How strange that they would TRY to make it messy...that bugs me immensely. And you're right about the wedding not being in the book. Austen did tend to kind of avoid love scenes (not bad ones...she didn't do those either, of course, but the romantic kind of scene) and weddings. People say it's because she didn't have personal experience in those areas. :)
Miss Elizabeth, thanks so much for inviting me to post! I really enjoyed it. :) <3
I totally agree with all of the points you made regarding the 2005 film version of Pride and Prejudice. The 1995 version with Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle will always be the best, in my mind.
ReplyDelete