This was a movie that was on my list of movies to watch for a quite some time. And after answering the February Tag of the Period Drama Challenge, I felt like I need to watch more Dickens period dramas. Luckily, after they took it down, Netflix's Instant Streaming put Nicholas Nickleby back up again and I was able to watch this without having to buy the movie. So, here's another movie to add to my list of Dickens movies I have seen!
Synopsis
DVD Box Art |
Synopsis
Nicholas Nickleby, at age nineteen, has become the head of his family after his father dies. In order to provide for his widowed mother and his sister, Kate, Nicholas pleas with his selfish uncle, Ralph Nickleby, to help them. However, Ralph Nickleby sends Nicholas away to work as a teacher at Dotheboys Hall (a dirty school where the students are mistreated) and though he sets Kate up with a job at a dressmaker, he uses her to get business men to go into business with him.
Characters
There's quite a long list of recognizable actors and actresses in this version of Nicholas Nickleby. If you have been watching period dramas for a while, I have no doubt that you'll recognize at least some people in this list. There are quite a few people from Emma (1996) in this movie.
There's quite a long list of recognizable actors and actresses in this version of Nicholas Nickleby. If you have been watching period dramas for a while, I have no doubt that you'll recognize at least some people in this list. There are quite a few people from Emma (1996) in this movie.
Actor/Actress | Character | Also Seen In |
Stella Gonet | Mrs. Nickleby | House of Eliott as Beatrice "Bea" Eliott |
Romola Garai | Kate Nickleby | Emma (2009) as Emma Woodhouse |
Tom Courtenay | Newman Noggs | Little Dorrit (2008) as William Dorrit |
Christopher Plummer | Ralph Nickleby | The Sound of Music as Captain Von Trapp |
Anne Hathaway | Madeline Bray | Becoming Jane as Jane Austen |
Jim Broadbent | Mr. Squeers | The Chronicles of Narnia as Professor Kirke |
Jamie Bell | Smike | The Adventures of Tintin (2011) as Tintin |
Juliet Stevenson | Mrs. Squeers | Emma (1996) as Mrs. Elton |
Lucy Davis | Maid (though I don't remember her) | Pride and Prejudice (1995) as Maria Lucas |
Edward Fox | Sir Mulberry Hawk | Daniel Deronda as Sir Hugo Mallinger |
Nathan Lane | Mr. Crummels | The Lion King as Timon |
Alan Cumming | Mr. Folair | Emma (1996) as Mr. Elton |
Sophie Thompson | Miss Lacreevy | Emma (1996) as Mrs. Elton |
Timothy Spall | Charles Cheeryble | The King's Speech as Winston Churchill |
Wooh! That was a long list! Now, onto the characters.
Nicholas and Smike |
Left to Right: Kate Nickleby, Miss Lacreevy, Mrs. Nickleby, and Smike |
Mr. Folair performs his dance (finally!) |
The Dastardly Mr. Squeers |
Ralph Nickleby, no doubt looking at monetary reports. |
Madeline Bray |
Scenery
I thought that the story would have been a little lighter than it turned out to be, but that's okay. Most of the story was of a serious nature, so the scenery and the colors reflect this serious nature of the story (quite a few dark/grayer scenes). The part with the acting company, however, does feature more colors and a happier setting. Most scenes take place in London; a good number of those scenes show the gritter side of 1800s London, so a lot of darker colors were present in those scenes. Dotheboys Hall was always dark, dusty, and dirty, which fit well with the place.
Costumes
It was very hard to tell what era this took place in based on the costuming. The film is very obviously set in the Victorian era, but a lot of the costumes don't really point to a specific time in the Victorian Era. The skirts of the dresses didn't seem like they were poofy enough for any period in the Victorian Era. If I had to guess, I would guess that the story took place in the 1840s or early 1850s (though IMDB says it's the 1850s) due to some of the bodices that the women wore, but again, the shape of the skirt was off. But if it was in the 1840s/1850s, some of the bodices didn't seem right either for the era... So, I guess I'm not quite sure what time period the film makers were trying to go for here...
Music
The music sounds very similar to the 1996 version of Emma. Why? Because both movies had soundtracks composed by Rachel Portman. The music I thought was a little too cheery for the storyline, but then again I like cheery music. There was a light feeling to the music even though the story was serious.
Overall: 3.5/5
I've only enjoyed a couple of Dickens stories, but this is another one of his stories that I enjoyed. The story is more serious, but there was a little bit of satire and jokes to keep the story from getting too dark (but don't get me wrong, there are still some scenes that are difficult to watch: you're not watching Emma here despite the fact that the two soundtracks are similar). I've read that this version isn't as accurate to the book as it could have been, but then I never read the book so I didn't notice it. I wouldn't mind watching this movie again, but I probably wouldn't go out of my way to watch it: I think it's more of a "Oh! It's on. I think I'll watch it" kind of movie.
The movie is rated PG for thematic material involving some violent action and a childbirth scene. The movie starts with Nicholas being born and you do see the cord being snapped after he is born. There is another birthing scene towards the end of the film in the form of a flashback, but it doesn't show as much as the first scene. There is violence involved with the scenes with the Squeers (but I elaborated about this above): from what I remember, there wasn't so much blood to cause concern (in fact, I can't remember any blood at all). There is also a scene where Sir Mulberry Hawk gets too fresh with Kate Nickleby, but she rebuffs him and her and her mother leave the scene. I would say the PG rating is appropriate and nothing gets too graphic or anything like that, but if you're still concerned about content, watch it first to judge for yourself: some parts are borderline for content.
Nicholas Nickleby is available on DVD and on Netflix Instant Streaming (for now). It is rated PG and runs for 132 minutes.
This review is apart of the Period Drama Challenge. Come join the fun!
The movie is rated PG for thematic material involving some violent action and a childbirth scene. The movie starts with Nicholas being born and you do see the cord being snapped after he is born. There is another birthing scene towards the end of the film in the form of a flashback, but it doesn't show as much as the first scene. There is violence involved with the scenes with the Squeers (but I elaborated about this above): from what I remember, there wasn't so much blood to cause concern (in fact, I can't remember any blood at all). There is also a scene where Sir Mulberry Hawk gets too fresh with Kate Nickleby, but she rebuffs him and her and her mother leave the scene. I would say the PG rating is appropriate and nothing gets too graphic or anything like that, but if you're still concerned about content, watch it first to judge for yourself: some parts are borderline for content.
Nicholas Nickleby is available on DVD and on Netflix Instant Streaming (for now). It is rated PG and runs for 132 minutes.
This is one of my very favourite movies! The soundtrack is also one of my favourites. I actually bought it last year and have very much enjoyed listening to it! You mentioned IMDB stated the story was set in the 1850s, but since the book was published in the early 1830s (or was it late 1820s?), I would've thought that would be when Charles Dickens set the story. Unfortunatley I have found IMDB to be terribly untrustworthy! Also, I hate to sound condescending, but it's actualy Mr. and Mrs. Crummels, not "Crumbles". Although that does sound like a Dickens name!
ReplyDeleteI read this book last year and could see how the movie doesn't entirely follow the novel,( for instance, a lot of characters were cut out, like the Kenwigs, Mr. Gregsbury, and a lot of people in the Crummels' theatrical company), but for a two hour movie, I think they did a pretty good job of trimming the book.
I enjoyed reading your review and I'm glad you enjoyed this movie!
According to IMDB, it said that the costume designer wanted to set it in the 1850s so she could incorporate some elements of the Industrial Revolution in there. I will say that it would have made more sense to set it in the 1830s.
DeleteAh! Thank you for telling me it was Crummels and not Crumbles. This whole time, I thought it was Crumbles haha. I'll go fix it right away!
Glad you liked this tolerably! ;) It isn't my favorite Dickens, but I do enjoy it. And I must say, I think it has a lighter feel than most of them. Heehee. :) And since you liked Little Dorrit and Bleak House, I really think you will like Our Mutual Friend. (I know, I know, it is already on your list. ;) ) And then you will have seen Timothy Spall in something else too! Oh and Jamie Bell, by the way, was in the newest Jane Eyre as St. John Rivers! Haha... I couldn't help thinking of Smike all the while. :P All the recognizable actors in this one was so fun...
ReplyDeleteI heard in a documentary about Charles Dickens that his stories started to get darker after he wrote David Copperfield. From looking at Wikipedia, it looks like Little Dorrit, Bleak House, and Our Mutual Friend were published after David Copperfield (and LD and BH were darker stories; I'm assuming the same for OMF?) and Nicholas Nickleby was published before (which had a lighter story).
DeleteI saw on IMDB that Jamie Bell was in Jane Eyre. I may watch that version one of these days (and, of course, I'll be thinking that St. John Rivers is Smike ;-) ).
Always enjoy this movie because it does offer a bit of humor among the darkness - plus this was one of Anne's early roles and she did a decent job. :)
ReplyDeleteThat's one of the things I liked about this movie was that while it was a serious story, it had bits of humor. :-)
DeleteI'm not a huge Dickens fan, but this does sound intriguing, and like it has a happier ending than some of his books. I really love Rachel Portman's music -- I have her soundtracks for Emma and Chocolat, and they both sound a bit alike, but I'm okay with that.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the thorough and enjoyable review!
Hmm... I wonder if Rachel Portman just has a certain style of composing soundtracks. I thought the sound track to Nicholas Nickleby sounded like the soundtrack to Emma. But either way, she makes nice music.
DeleteI will have to go to Netflix and see if this is still on there. I don't really like Charles Dicken's works, I'm not really sure why, but this story interests me. I will have to watch it sometime soon.
ReplyDeleteI read the book a few years ago and enjoyed it. I do want to see the movie and compare. Thanks for posting a review!
ReplyDeleteI do have a question: Do you know anything about the Series "Upstairs, Downstairs"? Saw it at the library and, having seen it mentioned on a few blogs (your's included), was curious about it.
I'm glad you enjoyed the review.
DeleteTo answer your question, yes, I do know about Upstairs, Downstairs. I've seen both the original series from the 70s and the new series. I personally thought the older series was better, though you had to work your way through the first two series before it started getting good. The newer series didn't have the charm of the original series and the content was much more mature than the original series (though the original series also had some content issues as well). The older one is worth a watch, but I'm not so sure about the newer one. Let me know if you have anymore questions.